How Is The Success of an Ad Campaign Measured in a Non-Profit?
Yesterday, Charmaine says, “We got hate mail.”
“Success!” I replied.
The return on investment (ROI) in the for-profit businesses should be sales generated.
But not-for-profits have a different type of “product” peddled. The purpose of a non-profit is to improve the human condition.
So when a non-profit places a media buy, how does Your Business Blogger(R) suggest measuring success?
In for-profit, we measure love.
In non-profits, we measure hate.
Our country is evenly and bitterly divided into two competing world views. The animosity is so great and the two camps have opinions so different that we all might as well be on different planets.
We non-profit marketers are now interplanetary ambassadors. Captain Kirk never had it so hard.
So measure the “good” ad with “bad” feedback.
The Alert Reader might suggest that media hits could be an immediate proxy for any ad campaign effectiveness. But here in the non-profit world, the marketing manager should measure opposing, hateful articles, not the friendlies. Getting your friends to agree is helpful, to be sure. Getting the opposition reacting is better.
On Reasoned Audacity we limit, moderate and edit hate-comments, because most are not helpful and make for atrocious reading. Motto: Delectare et Docere.
To Please and To Instruct.
Hate-mail is not pleasing to read. A wise marketer measures this mail, crunches this data, but uses only for internals, not public consumption — which would look like whining. Complaining about all the stoopid people on that other planet.
As Jack Welch advises: Never be a victim.
And as politicians are wont to say, “Throw a rock into a pack of dogs: the one that yelps is the one that got hit.”
Measure the hits by the number of yelps.
Americans United for Life Action published an open letter in a full page in the Dayton Daily News, an Ohio newspaper . Back page, section A. Good size and location. Marketers would prefer more frequency than a one-time media buy. But a good ad “sells” in more than the buy in a particular geographic location.
Today, effective prints ads are picked up by alternative media and broadcast-cable outlets.
(Goodness, during the Huckabee campaign, Ed Rollins got media attention for an ad he didn’t even run.)
See Charmaine’s Open Letter to Senator Obama here and at the jump.
Read the ad and let us know if you think it “sells” — if it persuades.
Thank you (foot)notes:
Americans United for Life Action Press Release.
From The Family Foundation.
Alliance Alert from ADF
Dear Senator Obama,
A 14-year-old girl walked into a Planned Parenthood clinic in Cincinnati, accompanied by her
soccer coach, John Haller. He was 21 years old and had initiated sexual activity with the girl when
she was 13. Now that she was pregnant, Haller wanted her to have an abortion.
Rather than calling the parents as required under Ohio law, Planned Parenthood called the soccer
coach’s cell phone and failed to verify he was the parent.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD TURNED A BLIND EYE…AND PERFORMED THE ABORTION!
Afterward, they provided the girl with a bag of condoms and a Depo-Provera shot.
Thirty-six states across the country require some form of parental notification or consent prior
to an abortion involving a minor child. And these laws are supported by 80% of the American
people. In addition to the obvious reason that parents need to be involved when their child
undergoes a medical procedure, these laws also protect young girls from sexual abuse. Research
shows high percentages of teen pregnancies are fathered by adult men and a relationship
between early teen sex and coercion.
SENATOR OBAMA, WHY DO YOU OPPOSE THESE PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT LAWS
THAT PROTECT OUR CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL ABUSE?
Despite Planned Parenthood’s actions, the parents of the Cincinnati teenager found out about
her abortion and the sexual abuse perpetrated by her soccer coach. Eventually John Haller was
convicted of seven counts of sexual battery and served three years in prison.
Senator Obama, the mainstream media refuses to ask you these questions, so we will:
Why have you promised Planned Parenthood that the first piece of legislation you will sign
is the Freedom of Choice Act, a piece of abortion legislation which would eliminate ALL of
the common-sense parental involvement laws across the country?
WHY DO YOU OPPOSE
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT LAWS THAT
PROTECT OUR CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL ABUSE?
Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President and CEO, Americans United for Life Action